9/12/2008 7:58:17 PM
Wikipedia: Fact, fiction, media bias, or opinion? Is this an Immigration problem or liberal ethnicity confusion about communists? Keep in mind, Ann is a staunch anti communist and very close to Vietnam Era commandos; very staunched military. Let’s clear up this Wikipedia problem without insulting anyone especially Ann Coulter. Remember who the source on Ann Coulter is and who has the dossier. The dossier speaks louder than any voice on this earth and can trump even the President of the United States of America who jumps to conclusions.
Who is the source for all of Ann Coulters sex life or love life? Dating life even? Who? Wikipedia is not the source for rumors on love life, hook ups, dating scene, and getting back at the Clintons for blow jobs and raping.
Ann, I do not know what you did and are only going by what you tell me. However, when you create a monster, you must slay it. If you do not kill it, it will kill you. Now do you want that monster to kill you? That is the question. It is like the 9-11 widows, they have a malfunction. They do not fight. They stand for peace. They have to be forced to fight because they are inherently weak.
What I do not is how you created the spin and they used the spin back on you. Now that you have cleared this up with me and told me what did or did not happen; they will hold you to the facts. The facts are based on what you said. If you read carefully, they are basing or someone is basing your biography and work on what is written about you and what you say.
Now read this over again and ask is it based on what they media have written or is it based on facts. In other words, is it what you say, what you do not say, or what is written about you which cannot be checked for accuracy? Apparently some Jew ball named Andrew Stein came out and challenged you about attacking his friends. I read that and I am shocked you would let someone I look down on run amuck in our life.
Slay the monster and take the monster out before the monster eats you. You either take them out or they take you out. That is the rule of the game. They do not play by the rules or principles; they do not follow the rules. Take them out, it is that simple. I will not tolerate weak, imbecile, and stupid decisions; they have painted as a person who makes very stupid decisions. Whether or not that is true is the story. It may be spin but they took that spin and used it back.
You are supposed to make smart decisions and only I have the story. But as long as they can take you out before you take them out, they win. Let’s say a story was written about me and a black girl who made a porn movie and I had scenes in there about endless oral sex that was so real, it made people buy my next tape. How would that affect you? So you ask me and I say, "honey this is entertainment and that was acting, they can believe what they want. It sells and that is the bottom line. It is hard to be a porn star and not have the audience think it is real." Porn stars (some) enjoy sex on tape and in their movies while others it is so fake. They do it and you cannot even tell if this is real or fake and that causes the audience to react. Some in a good way and some badly.
I know the truth and my spouse knows the truth, it looks so real and the producers call me back because it is so realistic. Then if you ask the girl she will say "I hated every moment and was acting." But asked if she would do it again, she say of course anytime. You see how the mind plays tricks? Now let me ask you a question okay. Are you messing with their head or are they mind F'ing you? You are mind F'ing them. Now I am telling you to slay the monster, take it out. I do not like weakness, I do not like cowards, I do not like traitors, and I see a lot of this.
So I go and kick this dudes ass and he says I am "anti semantic" and bashing him because I am jealous about you? Who is jealous? Slay the beast Ann, kill it. Take the beast out and do not let the beast take you first. It could be slander. In order to make it slander you have to charge the person who wrote it and show they maliciously did it and that malice had an affect on you. If it is a rumor, then you have to chase down who made the rumor. I have no idea who started the rumor and they say you did.
Did you start those rumors? Did you say those things or was it a joke or some joke. Did you use those men? Right now, even though you are not defeated and beat them, you look defeated but nobody such as those people are making an inch and they will say, "was it done maliciously" and to who? Who was the intended victim and who started the rumor or joke? That is slander and that is the legal game some lawyer is playing with you.
Your book is on slander. Remember, to prove slander you must prove falsity. To prove falsity, you must establish fact and the truth. The truth is you have been with me for 20 years and we spend almost every minute and waking moment alive working together and building our life. 3 years were taken and 1 year was needed for rehab and 1 additional year needed for physical therapy. That totals 5 years stolen, are you to blame? No. You have incredible pressure and enemies surrounding you in all directions and you must save your ammo. Hit the big guys and not waste so much time on first base, second base, or third base when you are actually a transvestite and engage in gay sex with men. Unbelievable. There is advertisement and free advertisement. How much would a person pay for that?
They are using that free advertisement against you. It is done in a way which you can establish as slander. The case being some three guys are identified as Gucci one, D'Souza, and some hairball name Stein. I will be honest, I hate losers. They are losers. I might respect them but if it came down to it, it looks sad. Now I come along and blow the story wildly open. Is she that mean or that sweet? I been with her for twenty years, none of them even seen her underwear collection, none of them can describe her tattoo, a body mole or marking; if needed, why didn't those men defend her honor? Why is it in Wikipedia to begin with? Is it accurate? Why didn't they say, "she lost her virginity at age 12 with a dog." Slander or just gossip?
Wikipedia version: (Nobody knows who wrote this biography and it was compile by media sources) That puts Ann Coulter in a position to write her biography to clear up her name like McCarthy, Nixon, Shoeless Joe Jackson, and a host of other celebrities.
Why is this only section which is CONTROVERSIAL? (From Wikipedia on Ann Coulter and her personal life; is this about immigration or against it? Why would Ann marry an Italian? Why would Ann marry and Indian? She is military and with an Asian guy for 20 years. Why would she use who he looks down on?)
Personal life
Coulter has been engaged several times, but never married. [11] She has dated Spin founder and publisher Bob Guccione, Jr., [12] and conservative writer Dinesh D'Souza. [13] In October 2007, she began dating Andrew Stein, the former president of the New York City Council, a liberal Democrat. When asked about the relationship, Stein told the paper, "She's attacked a lot of my friends, but what can I say, opposites attract!"[14] On January 7, 2008, however, Stein told the New York Post that the relationship was over, citing irreconcilable differences. [15]
Coulter owns both a condominium in Manhattan and a house, bought in 2005, in Palm Beach, Florida. Although she says that usually she lives in New York, she votes in Palm Beach and is not registered to do so in New York. [16] She is a fan of the Grateful Dead,[17][18] and some of her favorite books include The Bible, Wuthering Heights, Anna Karenina, true crime stories about serial killers and anything by Dave Barry.[19]
http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/453CFAFD-A8D9-4BC8-9346-240A2E8FA9EA/
Sworn fact: I did not change anything on this entry. All hilarity and editing aside, I consider Coulter not worthy of true debate, as she is a rabid (single) dominatrix. Commenting on her marital status, I am quoted (here, now) as saying, "I wonder why."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
